![]() As a cross platform Palm OS app developer, this doesn't hinder me in the least. ![]() It is only the portion of CW used for building the handheld side of the deal. Mac CodeWarrior for PalmOS has nothing to do with conduit or desktop application development. ![]() For all I know MW may have since abadoned Resource Forks and other similar idiocy since V 5.0 Borland Turbo C 1.0 for Dos was a better product than that heap of junk. (*) that comment is related to my personal experience buying CodeWarrior for PalmOS V 5.0 Windows, and finding it to be one heck of a poor excuse for an application Port. Incidentally I wouldn't be surprised to see something new and better, for the Wintel platform, storm the Palm ARM world and wipe Codewarrior off the planet (as it deserved to be long ago) (*) Incidentally I was wondering if what just happened would happen, once the Motorola chip was abandoned. If they're indeed proficient programmers, owning both a Mac and Wintel machine should at some point enable them to offer true cross-platform compatibility by writing conduits for both platforms. I don't think it should have any effect of significant importance.Īny SERIOUS developer who desires to continue in their task should be able to afford the few hundred bucks required to hook themselves up with a Wintel machine, to continue development.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |